Asian solamente feminine travellers are challenged by gendered and racialised dangers.
Gender intersects with competition in amplifying Asian ladies’ perception of danger.
Dangers are conceptualised whilst the unequal power relations underlying tourism area.
Feminine travellers gain empowerment and reconstruct identities through risk-taking.
Specific empowerment may extend to social transformations at a level that is micro.
This study explores how Asian women perceive and negotiate the risks of travelling alone and the meanings of these processes in response to the emergence of the solo female travel market in Asia. The lived experiences of 35 solo feminine travellers from 10 East and Southeast parts of asia were analysed constructivist that is using concept. The findings expose that Asian solamente female travellers had been worried about gendered ( e.g. Intimate attack and road harassment) and racialised (e.g. Discrimination and social disapproval) dangers catalog brides, which imply the unequal energy relations underpinning the gendered and racialised tourism room. The findings additionally expose proof where gender intersects with battle in amplifying and constructing women that are asian perception of risk. The research sjust hows exactly how Asian solo female travellers gained empowerment and experienced self-transformations through negotiating the potential risks and additional reveals exactly just how these individual transformations may expand to social transformations at a micro degree within an Asian context.
Previous article in problem
Next article in problem
Dr Elaine Chiao Ling Yang is a co-employee Lecture within the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management, Griffith University. She holds a PhD in Tourism from Griffith University. Elaine’s research interest is based on the aspects of Asian tourism, feminine travellers and tourist danger perception. Her works are posted in Tourism Management, Journal of Travel Research, Current Issues in Tourism, and Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management. Elaine can be an editorial board user of Tourism Management views and Annals of Leisure Research. She actually is also a volunteer administrator of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Share: Elaine Yang contributed into the conception and design regarding the task, literature review, information collection, analysis and interpretation of information, drawing implications and summary, drafting and revising the manuscript, handling reviewers’ responses and communication utilizing the log.
Dr Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is just A senior lecturer at griffith University, Australia. Catheryletter’s research interest is on tourist and visitor behavior, with a passionate concentrate on females, families and young kids as well as on understanding these sections from A asian viewpoint. Catheryn has co-published two publications: Asian Genders in Tourism and Females and Travel. Catheryn is Editor-in-Chief of Tourism Management views and serves from the editorial panels of other hospitality and tourism journals. This woman is Vice-Chair that is second of Council for Australasian Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE). She actually is additionally the founder and chair of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Contribution: Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore contributed input that is intellectual the general task including methodology and literary works review, and subsequent critical revisions of numerous drafts regarding the manuscript.
Associate Professor Charles Arcodia could be the Deputy Head for the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management at Griffith University, Australia. Charles’s research passions are often in the area of occasion management and explore several associated areas such as for instance tourism administration training and heritage management that is cultural. He’s additionally the Executive Editor associated with the International Journal of Event Management analysis and it is a board that is editorial of five other scholarly journals.
Share: Charles Arcodia contributed into the conception and design associated with the scholarly research; the interpretation regarding the information and also the conclusions drawn as a result; reviews associated with the draft paper; and interpretation associated with the reviewers’ commentary, and a reaction to the reviewers.